Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 4447/1997 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court remands case for retrial due to lower court's failure to rule on litigation costs.

Numero d'incarto KKO 4447/1997
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision to remand the case for a new trial. The lower court had previously rejected a request for permission to appeal but later ordered a retrial after a complaint was filed, yet failed to address the litigation costs claimed by the parties. Consequently, the Supreme Court determined that the lower court's procedure was incorrect because it did not rule on the cost claims within the remanded proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Korkein oikeus 19.12.1997: Korkeimmassa oikeudessa valituslupaa koskevan lain 1 luku; Hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta ja oikeudenkäyntikuluvastuuseen sovellettavasta laista: Hovioikeuden on ratkaistava oikeudenkäyntikuluvaatimukset, jos ne esitetään valituslupa- ja kanteluasiassa yhteydessä.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
litigation costs remand for retrial procedural correctness Supreme Court lower court duty diritto a una copertura assicurativa più estesa vizio di procedura giudizio sul merito della causa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Korkein oikeus 19.12.1997
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2019_638
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court wrongly denied further proceedings permission due to factual error.
kko-other_2022_365
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding legal costs for granting further stay of execution permission.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2021:55
Supreme Court allows appeal against refusal of oral hearing for lawyer representing asylum seeker. The court found the lower court failed to hold an oral hearing. The court ordered the case remanded for a new oral hearing. The court held that the lower court must hold an oral hearing. The court ruled that the lower court erred in refusing the oral hearing. The court decided that the lower court must hold an oral hearing. The court determined that the lower court failed to hold an oral hearing. The court concluded that the lower court must hold an oral hearing.
kko-leave_2026_211
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where client's fee claim targets a non-party defendant.
kko-precedent_2000_44
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where defendant missed personal court hearing, causing appeal dismissal under procedural law.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Korkein oikeus hylkäsi 24.3.1993 vireille tulleessa riita-asiassa tehdyn valituslupahakemuksen 30.6.1995, mutta sen jälkeen tehdyn kantelun johdosta poisti asiaa koskevan hovioikeuden tuomion ja palautti asian hovioikeuden käsiteltäväksi osoittaen hovioikeuden lausumaan myös esitetyistä oikeudenkäyntikuluvaatimuksista. Hovioikeus käsitteli asian uudelleen, mutta ei lausunut Korkeimmassa oikeudessa valituslupa- ja kanteluasian yhteydessä esitetyistä oikeudenkäyntikuluvaatimuksista.

Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta ja oikeudenkäyntikuluvastuuseen sovellettavasta laista.