Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO 4420/1997 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court rules bankruptcy administrator must investigate debt origin to determine pre-bankruptcy status for payment.

Numero d'incarto KKO 4420/1997
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the bankruptcy administrator's request to compel the lower court to investigate the origin of a debt. The administrator argued that debts arising after the bankruptcy filing could not be claimed by the administrator, while the lower court had only partially recognized the claim based on pre-bankruptcy timing. The court held that the administrator has a duty to verify the debt's formation date to ensure only pre-bankruptcy claims are paid. Consequently, the lower court was ordered to use its inquiry powers to determine the specific timeframe of the debt's creation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act; Section 2 of the Code of Judicial Procedure: The bankruptcy administrator is obligated to investigate the origin of claims to distinguish between pre-bankruptcy and post-bankruptcy debts, and the lower court must exercise its inquiry powers to ascertain the factual basis of the claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
bankruptcy administrator duties pre-bankruptcy debt determination court inquiry powers claim origin investigation post-bankruptcy debt exclusion nozione di concorrenza concurrence actuelle et concurrence potentielle concorso di prestazioni d'assicurazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act
Section 2 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Lääninverovirasto oli yhtiön konkurssituomiossa annetun osoituksen mukaisesti vaatinut kanteessaan vahvistettavaksi, ettei A:lla ollut konkurssissa valvomiaan palkkasaatavia muun muassa sillä perusteella, ettei A voinut konkurssissa valvoa konkurssin alkamisen jälkeen syntynyttä saatavaa. Alemmat oikeudet olivat vahvistaneet maksettavaksi A:n valvoman palkkasaatavan "siltä osin kuin saaminen on konkurssia edeltävältä ajalta". Kysymys käräjäoikeuden velvollisuudesta kyselyoikeutta käyttäen selvittää, miltä osalta saatavan peruste oli syntynyt ennen konkurssin alkamista.