Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 3402/1997 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against lower court's arbitrary award of 1,000 marks to legal aid agent.

Numero d'incarto KKO 3402/1997
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision to award only 1,000 marks to a legal aid agent. The agent had submitted a detailed invoice totaling nearly 26,000 marks, but the lower court arbitrarily reduced the payment without providing any reasoning. The court ruled that such an unexplained reduction violated the principles of legal aid and due process, necessitating a full payment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Maksuttomasta oikeudenkäynnistä annetun lain 10 §; avustajan palkkion määrääminen ilman perustelua on laittomatonta ja rikkoo oikeudenkäyntiprosessin periaatteita.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legal aid agent court costs arbitrary reduction lack of reasoning procedural fairness Supreme Court appeal financial compensation determinazione dei compensi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Maksuttomasta oikeudenkäynnistä annetun lain 10 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1997_12
Supreme Court increases lawyer fee from 1,100 to 3,952 marks based on standard task volumes and Ministry guidelines.
kko-precedent_1987_106
Supreme Court allows attorney fees for free trial but rejects appeal filing fees as state-funded.
kko-precedent_1990_20
Supreme Court dismisses appeal allowing retrial when lower court fails to justify fee reduction under free trial law.
kko-precedent_1992_36
Supreme Court allows lawyer fee for assisting defendant in lower court appeal but denies appeal filing fee.
kko-other_2013_2021
Supreme Court allows fee claim for defense counsel regarding unexplained dismissal of time-based costs by lower court.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Maksuttomasta oikeudenkäynnistä annetun lain nojalla määrätty avustaja oli esittänyt hovioikeudelle palkkiosta ja kuluista eritellyn laskun arvonlisäveroineen määrältään yhteensä runsaat 26 000 markkaa. Hovioikeus oli perusteluitta määrännyt avustajalle maksettavaksi 1 000 markan palkkion. Kysymys palkkioratkaisun perustelemisesta ja palkkion määrästä.