Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1189/1997 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court held that a spouse's new mortgage on shared property does not bind the other spouse without their consent.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1189/1997
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court ruled that a spouse cannot be bound by a new mortgage on property acquired after their marriage ends without their explicit consent. The case involved spouses A and B who had previously mortgaged their joint property, but after A acquired sole ownership via a partition agreement, A subsequently mortgaged the same property to secure B's debts. The court determined that the original general security agreements did not extend to A's post-partition actions, thereby protecting the non-mortgaging spouse from liability.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Mortgage Act; Section 10 of the Security Act: A spouse is not bound by a mortgage registered on property they acquired after the dissolution of their marriage unless they have given their consent to the security.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spousal liability mortgage registration property partition general security agreement post-marital debt consent requirement joint ownership istituzioni finanziarie

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Mortgage Act
Section 10 of the Security Act
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1991_75
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; standard mortgage clause binding only husband, not wife for future debts.
kko-precedent_1989_106
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; general security pledge does not cover third-party criminal damages unforeseeable by pledgor.
kko-other_1999_2241
Supreme Court held that mortgage liability extends to the spouse's share when the whole property is pledged as security.
kko-precedent_1996_90
Supreme Court allows bill of exchange claim against spouse forced to sign as guarantor under duress.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__556
Holding holder lacks right to claim payment against transferor when transferor lost security held by third party.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Aviopuolisot A ja B olivat pantanneet yhdessä omistamaansa kiinteistöön kiinnitettyjä haltijavelkakirjoja kolmella yleispanttaussitoumuksella pankille vastuidensa vakuudeksi. Puolisoiden yhteiselämän päätyttyä kiinteistö oli ositussopimuksen perusteella tullut A:n omistukseen. A oli sen jälkeen pantannut uudet kiinteistöön kiinnitetyt haltijavelkakirjat pankille vakuudeksi B:n ja hänen liikeyrityksensä vastuista.

Kysymys siitä, sitoivatko panttaukset A:ta pankin velkoessa B:ltä saataviaan. Kysymys myös yleispanttaussitoumusten sovittelusta.