Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2026-2 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding unlawful home search and damages for privacy violation by prison officers.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2026-2
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal a case where a prisoner claimed his home search by supervising officers was unlawful and violated his privacy rights. The lower courts had dismissed the claim for damages, finding the search did not meet the strict criteria of a formal home search. The Court decided to allow the appeal to determine whether the specific actions taken by the officers constituted a violation of the prisoner's constitutional right to privacy and entitled him to compensation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A search conducted by prison officers for security purposes, lacking the formal characteristics of a judicial home search, may still constitute an unlawful interference with the right to privacy if it exceeds necessary limits, entitling the individual to damages.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prisoner rights home search legality privacy violation damages claim supervising officers provvedimento istruttorio d'assicurazione sociale misure di sicurezza sfratto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2004_7
Supreme Court allows appeal on detention grounds where no statutory conditions exist, overriding administrative law restrictions.
kko-precedent_2017_20
Supreme Court allows partial compensation for home search where police waited inside for 40 minutes without notifying suspect of right to witness.
kko-precedent_2012_28
Supreme Court grants retrial for dog owner negligence case due to lack of precedent on liability rules.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:64
Supreme Court dismisses request to convert supervision time to prison due to lack of apparent indifference.
kko-precedent_2016_71
Supreme Court allows costs for illegal home search due to lack of strong grounds and procedural failure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Vankeusvanki A oli ollut valvotulla poistumisluvalla vankilasta kotonaan. Häntä

valvoneet virkamiehet olivat tarkastaneet asunnon turvallisuuden ja tässä yhteydessä

väliaikaisesti poistaneet asunnosta teräaseita huoneiston parvekkeelle.

A vaati käräjäoikeudessa suoritetun, kotietsinnäksi katsomansa tarkastuksen

toteamista laittomaksi ja vahingonkorvausta yksityiselämän suojan rikkomisesta.

Käräjäoikeus katsoi, ettei suoritettu tarkastus vastannut kotietsintää, jätti

vahvistusvaatimuksen tutkimatta ja hylkäsi siihen perustuvan korvausvaatimuksen.

Hovioikeus ei myöntänyt A:lle jatkokäsittelylupaa. Kysymys siitä, oliko A:lla oikeus

saattaa sanottu menettely tuomioistuimen tutkittavaksi.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.