Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO VL:2025-83 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court held a dining knife is not a firearm under Finnish Criminal Code Section 21.6.1.3.

Numero d'incarto KKO VL:2025-83
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal regarding whether a dining knife constituted a firearm under Section 21.6.1.3 of the Criminal Code. The prosecution argued the weapon was a firearm, while the defense contended it was merely a dangerous tool. The court decided that a dining knife does not meet the statutory definition of a firearm or a weapon deemed equivalent to one.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 21.6.1.3 of the Criminal Code; Section 21.6.1.3 of the Criminal Code: A dining knife is not classified as a firearm or a weapon deemed equivalent to a firearm under the specified provisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Criminal Code firearm definition dining knife classification Section 21.6.1.3 dangerous tool distinction weapon equivalence test leave to appeal granted criminal liability threshold minaccia non comprovata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 21.6.1.3 of the Criminal Code
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2010_36
Supreme Court held a metal chair is not a weapon comparable to firearms under aggravated assault law.
appeal_1978_kouvola__387
Court held that a threat to life following immediate physical assault constitutes a single continuous criminal act.
appeal_1983_kouvola__205
Court held violent resistance by official does not constitute separate crime of aggravated assault.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:48
Supreme Court mandates one-year mandatory imprisonment for aggravated assault despite prior record time lapse.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:19
Supreme Court dismisses prosecutor's request to vacate a final drug trafficking sentence due to stricter sentencing under the same statute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A:n syyksi oli luettu pahoinpitely, jossa tekovälineenä oli käytetty ruokailuveistä.

Kysymys siitä, oliko ruokailuveistä pidettävä rikoslain 21 luvun 6 §:n 1 momentin 3

kohdassa tarkoitettuna teräaseena taikka siihen rinnastettavana hengenvaarallisena

välineenä.

Valituslupakortti sisältää kuvauksen siitä kysymyksestä, johon liittyen asiassa on

myönnetty valituslupa. Sen sisältö ei sido korkeinta oikeutta eikä rajoita asian

käsittelyä siltä osin kuin valituslupa on myönnetty.