Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding objection to appeal ban and admissibility of decision.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal concerning the objection to the appeal ban attached to an administrative decision and the decision's admissibility. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the decision in question was not subject to appeal under the relevant administrative and nationality laws. Consequently, the court determined that the procedural objections raised by the appellant failed to meet the statutory requirements for review.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAdministrative Procedure Act s. 5; Administrative Act s. 8, 22 § 1 and 3, 33; Nationality Act s. 13 § 1 mom. 6, 17, 42, 45, 46: An appeal against a decision containing an appeal ban is inadmissible if the decision itself is not legally appealable under the governing statutes.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Hallinto-oikeuden päätökseen liitetyn valituskiellon ja sen päätöksen valituskelpoisuuden osalta kuten KHO 22.2.2007 taltionumero 383.
Hallintolainkäyttölain 5 §, hallintolain 8 §, 22 §:n 1 ja 3 momentti sekä 33 §, kansalaisuuslain 13 §:n 1 momentin 6 kohta, 17 §, 42 §, 45 § ja 46 §.
Kort referat på svenska
---
[SV]
I fråga om det besvärsförbud som fogats till förvaltningsdomstolens beslut och beslutets överklagbarhet avgjordes målet på samma sätt som HFD 22.3.2007 liggarnummer 383.
Förvaltningsprocesslagen 5 §, förvaltningslagen 8, 22 § 1 och 3 mom. samt 33 §, medborgarskapslagen 13 § 1 mom. 6 punkten samt 17, 42, 45 och 46 §