Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1998:79 Generato dall'IA

Appeal dismissed because planning criteria approval is not a final decision subject to administrative review.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1998:79
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the city council's decision on planning criteria for coastal areas. The applicant argued that the decision required binding resolution of future planning criteria, but the court found the matter concerned preparatory work for the final plan approval. Consequently, under Section 91 of the Municipalities Act, no appeal was permissible against the criteria decision itself.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Kuntalaki 91 §; The approval of planning criteria for coastal areas during general planning is not a final decision subject to appeal under the Municipalities Act, as it pertains to preparatory work for the final plan approval.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Municipalities Act appeal planning criteria approval general plan preparation administrative review scope coastal area zoning riserva dell'ordine pubblico legittimazione del comune protezione della natura e del paesaggio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 91 of the Municipalities Act
Generato dall'IA
kho-other_2018_4379
Supreme Administrative Court partially allowed appeal against town council's coastal zone plan amendment due to insufficient environmental impact studies.
kho-precedent_2003_102
Supreme Court dismisses landowner's appeal when zoning plan is partially revoked by lower court.
kho-precedent_2009_91
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against administrative board's decision to ignore appeal regarding coastal structure legality.
kho-other_2017_2813
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed late appeal on wind farm zoning plan due to procedural time limits and lack of legal basis.
admin_1991_turku-and-pori-county__774
Administrative court dismissed appeal as town council's decision only addressed implementation, not the underlying complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kaupunginvaltuusto hyväksyi ranta-alueiden yleiskaavoitusta jatkettaessa käytettävät mitoitusperusteet. Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että päätöksellä ei voitu sitovasti ratkaista, millaisin mitoitusperustein yleiskaava tullaan myöhemmin hyväksymään. Kun kysymys oli yleiskaavan hyväksymistä koskevan päätöksen valmistelusta, ei mitoitusperusteiden hyväksymistä koskevasta päätöksestä saanut kuntalain 91 §:n mukaan valittaa. Korkein hallinto-oikeus pysytti lopputulokseltaan voimassa lääninoikeuden päätöksen, jolla kunnan jäsenen valitus kaupunginvaltuuston päätöksestä oli jätetty tutkimatta.

Kuntalaki 91 §