Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1998:21 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court allowed expanded pharmacy zone decision based on drug availability requirements under Pharmacy Act.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1998:21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court allowed the Medicines Agency's decision to expand a pharmacy's licensed area beyond its original boundaries. The agency determined this action was necessary to meet drug availability standards set by the Pharmacy Act, and the court found no legal basis to invalidate the decision. Consequently, the court upheld the agency's authority to rezone the pharmacy area based on statutory requirements for public access to medicines.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Pharmacy Act 1996, s. 1; s. 39; s. 40: The Medicines Agency possesses the authority to designate a larger area for a pharmacy than originally granted if such an expansion is required to fulfill the statutory conditions for drug availability.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Pharmacy Act 1996 drug availability requirements pharmacy licensing area Medicines Agency authority administrative decision review estensione del diritto di visita estensione della procedura modificazione delle conclusioni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Pharmacy Act 1996, s. 1
Pharmacy Act 1996, s. 39
Pharmacy Act 1996, s. 40

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
D:2207/3/97
Generato dall'IA
kho-precedent_1999_61
Conversion of pharmacy to side pharmacy met legal requirements; appeal dismissed without transfer to Council.
admin_2015_eastern-finland__433
Pharmacy board appeal dismissed; pharmacy service point applicant lacks standing as assessment doesn't affect other pharmacists' status.
kho-precedent_2010_65
Supreme Court allows new pharmacy approval in Riihimäki despite no proven drug access issues or major local changes.
admin_1988_water-superior__83
Administrative court dismissed appeal as Water Act evidence requirements were insufficient for cost comparison.
kho-precedent_2000_39
Supreme Administrative Court ruled that a separate company's turnover cannot be included in the pharmacy's turnover for tax purposes.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Lääkelaitoksella katsottiin olevan lääkelain muutoksen 895/1996 voimaantulosäännökseen perustuva toimivalta määrätä myös aikaisemmin apteekkioikeuden siihen kuuluvine oikeuksineen saaneelle apteekille lääkelain 40 §:ssä tarkoitettu aikaisempaa laajempi alue, jolla apteekin tulee sijaita. Lääkelaitoksen päätös täytti lääkkeiden saatavuudelle lääkelain 1 ja 39 §:ssä säädetyt edellytykset, eikä sitä ollut pidettävä lainvastaisena. Katso myös D:2207/3/97

Äänestys 4-1.