Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1997:64 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against food safety authority's refusal to add taurine and caffeine to soft drinks.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1997:64
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the company's appeal against the Food Safety Authority's refusal to grant a license to add taurine and caffeine to soft drinks. The court noted that the combined effects of these substances were unknown and required further safety assessment before approval. Consequently, the refusal was deemed a justified restriction under EU law to protect public health rather than arbitrary discrimination.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 30 and Art. 36 of the Treaty establishing the European Community; The refusal to grant a license to add untested substances to food is a justified restriction on trade for the protection of human health and does not constitute arbitrary discrimination.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
food safety regulation additive approval EU free movement public health protection proportionality principle taurine caffeine mixture administrative review rischi per la salute

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 30 of the Treaty establishing the European Community
Art. 36 of the Treaty establishing the European Community
Generato dall'IA
kho-other_2014_1394
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; Fimea's drug classification stands under Finnish Drug Act and EU free movement rules.
kho-other_2014_1393
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; Valeriana tablet classified as drug based on pharmacological effects, not marketing claims.
kko-precedent_2004_68
Supreme Court allows seizure order continuation despite prolonged proceedings and foreign aid data usage.
kko-precedent_2003_50
Supreme Court dismissed theft charge due to insufficient evidence, allowing only concealment conviction despite prior lower court findings.
kko-precedent_1999_89
Supreme Court allows full confiscation of illicit gains from marijuana cultivation, rejecting cost deductions.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Virvoitusjuomaan oli tarkoitus lisätä muun ohella tauriininimistä aminohappoa ja kofeiinia. Molemmat aineet vaikuttavat sydämeen ja keskushermostoon. Kofeiini- ja tauriinilisäyksen yhteisvaikutuksia ei tunneta. Niitä ei ole tutkittu. Yhteisvaikutukset vaativat lisätutkimuksia ja turvallisuuden arviointia. Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ettei ollut varmuutta siitä, ettei kysymyksessä oleva yhdistelmä aiheuta vaaraa juoman nauttijan terveydelle. Yhtiön hakeman luvan epääminen merkitsi sellaista kieltoa tai rajoitusta, joka on Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuksen 36 artiklassa tarkoitetulla tavalla perusteltu ihmisten terveyden ja elämän suojelemiseksi. Saadun selvityksen huomioon ottaen lisäämislupaa koskevan hakemuksen hylkääminen ei ollut sanotussa artiklassa tarkoitettu keino mielivaltaiseen syrjintään eikä kaupan peiteltyyn rajoittamiseen. Elintarvikeviraston päätös, jolla hakemus oli hylätty, ei ollut Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuksen 30 tai 36 artiklan vastainen eikä muutoinkaan lainvastainen.

VitaminoimisA 1 § (281/72) VitaminoimisA 9 § VitaminoimisA 14 §

ElintarvikelisäaineA 6 § (521/92) ElintarvikelisäaineA 11 §