Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1997:50 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; gender quota exception justified by special reasons and proportionality.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1997:50
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the City Council's decision to appoint a gender-imbalanced planning committee. The Council argued that appointing only men was justified by special reasons under the Act on Equality between Women and Men, Section 4(2), which allows deviations from the 40% minimum quota. The court held that the deviation was lawful because the special reasons outweighed the general equality principle in this specific context.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Act on Equality between Women and Men, Section 4(2); Section 139 of the Administrative Procedure Act; The Act on Equality between Women and Men permits deviations from the minimum gender quota when special reasons exist, provided the deviation is proportionate and justified.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
gender equality quota deviation special reasons administrative procedure proportionality principle public appointments planning committee parità fra lavoratori di sesso maschile e di sesso femminile

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Act on Equality between Women and Men, Section 4(2)
Section 139 of the Administrative Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
admin_1995_turku-and-pori-county__666
City council committee appointment dismissed due to failure to meet gender quota requirements under equality law.
kho-precedent_2017_2
Supreme Administrative Court allows gender equality claim against city council for appointing board members to municipal majority-owned companies.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2021:125
Supreme Administrative Court quashes automatic termination of Data Inspectorate chief's probation due to GDPR minimum term violation.
kko-precedent_1991_98
City council election for male legal advisor dismissed as discriminatory under gender equality law.
kho-precedent_2009_95
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against disciplinary dismissal of a pastor for refusing mixed-gender worship duties.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kaupunginhallitus nimesi yleiskaavan tarkistustyön ohjaus- ja valmisteluelimeksi asetettuun yleiskaavatoimikuntaan 2 miestä ja 2 naista luottamushenkilöistä sekä viran puolesta teknisen apulaiskaupunginjohtajan, sosiaali- ja terveystoimenjohtajan ja kaavoituspäällikön, jotka kaikki olivat miehiä. Koska virkamiesten nimeäminen oli ollut perusteltua ja erityinen syy naisten ja miesten välisestä tasa-arvosta annetun lain 4 §:n 2 momentissa tarkoitetusta 40 prosentin vähimmäismäärästä poikkeamiseen, kaupunginhallituksen päätös oli lainmukainen.

Äänestys 4-1.

L naisten ja miesten välisestä tasa-arvosta 4 § 2 mom

KunL 139 §