Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KHO:1997:45 Generato dall'IA

Social assistance claim dismissed due to missed six-month filing deadline despite correct court submission.

Numero d'incarto KHO:1997:45
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed a compensation claim against a municipality for child care costs because the applicant failed to file the request within the six-month statutory period. Although the claim was submitted to the correct court, the delay in initiating the procedure meant the applicant lost the right to compensation. The court held that the error in the initial submission date did not interrupt the limitation period, resulting in the rejection of the claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Sosiaalihuoltolain 42 § 2 momentti; Sosiaalihuoltolain 49 § 2 momentti ja 3 momentti: The six-month limitation period for filing a compensation claim under the Social Services Act is strict, and a delay in initiating the procedure results in the loss of the right to compensation regardless of the correctness of the court addressed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
social services act compensation claim limitation period statutory deadline child care costs procedural default municipal liability perenzione dell'istanza di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Sosiaalihuoltolain 42 § 2 momentti
Sosiaalihuoltolain 45 § 1 mom
Sosiaalihuoltolain 49 § 2 mom
Sosiaalihuoltolain 49 § 3 mom
Generato dall'IA
admin_1997_turku-and-pori-county__448
Child protection costs claim dismissed due to missed six-month filing deadline under social services act.
admin_1993_vaasa-county__237
Court allows county to recover social care costs from neighbor where official residence was legally established there.
insurance_1977_6687-1976
Insurance court dismisses claim where late notice caused by minor's age lacks serious reasons.
admin_1997_turku-and-pori-county__504
Administrative court dismissed municipality's claim for nursing home costs when resident voluntarily moved.
insurance_2004_7807-2003
Insurance court dismissed claim for mental distress compensation due to short-term cohabitation and relationship duration.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A:n kunnan perusturvalautakunta vaati lääninoikeudelle 5.12.1994 saapuneessa hakemuksessa B:n kunnan velvoittamista korvaamaan neljälle lapselle ajalla 22.10.-25.11.1993 annetusta lastenkotihoidosta aiheutuneet kustannukset. Korvaushakemusta ei ollut pantu vireille sosiaalihuoltolain 42 §:n 2 momentissa säädetyssä kuuden kuukauden määräajassa. B:n kunta ei ollut kirjallisesti suostunut korvaamaan vaadittuja kustannuksia. A:n kunta oli siten menettänyt oikeuden korvauksen saamiseen. Sillä seikalla, että korvaushakemus oli tehty aikaisemmin säädetyn määräajan kuluessa väärälle lääninoikeudelle, ei ollut vanhentumisen katkaisevaa vaikutusta.

Lääninoikeuden ei olisi tullut jättää korvaushakemusta liian myöhään tehtynä tutkimatta. Korkein hallinto-oikeus myönsi valitusluvan, kumosi ja poisti lääninoikeuden päätöksen ja tutki asian välittömästi ja hylkäsi hakemuksen.

LastensuojeluL 45 § 1 mom

SosiaalihuoltoL 42 §

SosiaalihuoltoL 49 § 2 mom

SosiaalihuoltoL 49 § 3 mom