Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 229/1993 ECLI:ES:TC:1993:229A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of content and procedural defects in the social court judgment.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 229/1993
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, citing procedural flaws and a lack of constitutional content in the challenged social court ruling. The applicant argued that the judgment was not properly notified and violated the principle of contradiction, while the state contended the procedural timeline was valid. The court rejected these claims, finding the judgment legally sufficient and the appeal devoid of substantive constitutional issues.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The Constitutional Court established that an appeal is inadmissible if the challenged judgment lacks constitutional content and procedural defects do not justify a violation of the principle of contradiction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Constitutional Appeal Procedural Defects Principle of Contradiction Lack of Constitutional Content Social Court Judgment Notification Defects Inadmissibility

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 CE
Art. 24.1 CE

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2386-1992

Fecha de resolución

12/07/1993

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.386/1992

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: no caducidad de la acción. Principio de contradicción: no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Manuela Suárez Suárez contra providencia del Juzgado de lo Social núm. 2 de Oviedo que no fue notificada al recurrente y señala día para efectuar lanzamiento de vivienda.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00229-1992_02386.pdf