Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 134/1993 ECLI:ES:TC:1993:134A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of procedural exhaustion and absence of defense violation.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 134/1993
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust prior judicial remedies regarding the case file's archiving. The applicant argued that the archiving violated his right to a speedy process and defense rights, while the lower court maintained the procedural steps were correct. The court rejected these claims, ruling that the applicant did not demonstrate a violation of constitutional guarantees sufficient to warrant the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The right to a speedy process and defense is not violated when a case is archived following proper procedural steps without infringing upon the accused's rights.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
right to speedy process procedural exhaustion defense rights violation case archiving constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 CE
Art. 24.1 CE

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Luis López Guerra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2012-1991

Fecha de resolución

26/04/1993

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.012/1991

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a un proceso sin dilaciones: actuaciones archivadas. Derecho de defensa: no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Manuel Rosa Recuerda contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Sevilla en el recurso de queja contra el dictado de archivo por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 10 de Sevilla, en diligencias previas.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1993/1993_00134-1991_02012.pdf