Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 262/1992 ECLI:ES:TC:1992:262A Generato dall'IA

Spanish Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and insufficient sentence motivation.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 262/1992
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the effective judicial protection of judges and courts was not met. The applicant, Chanel S.A., argued the lower court's dismissal of proceedings lacked sufficient constitutional motivation in its judgment. The court held that without adequate reasoning in the appealed sentence, the fundamental right to a reasoned judicial decision was violated, rendering the appeal procedurally inadmissible.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 CE; Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.: The effective judicial protection of judges and courts requires that the appealed sentence be sufficiently motivated to allow for a meaningful review of the legal and factual grounds.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection judges and courts sentence motivation constitutional demand procedural inadmissibility

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 CE
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don José Gabaldón López y don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2620-1991

Fecha de resolución

14/09/1992

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.620/1991

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Chanel, S. A.», contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona, que desestima el recurso de apelación contra el Auto dictado por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 9 de Barcelona, de sobreseimiento en diligencias previas.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1992/1992_00262-1991_02620.pdf