Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 260/1991 ECLI:ES:TC:1991:260A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of comparison term violating equality principle.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 260/1991
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the amparo appeal filed by José María Maldonado Nausia against a Supreme Court ruling denying radio license concessions. The applicant argued violations of equality, freedom of expression, and due process under Articles 14, 16.1, and 20.1 of the Constitution. The Court rejected these claims because the challenged administrative decision lacked a comparative term, rendering the alleged inequality argument legally unfounded.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 16.1 C.E.; Art. 20.1 C.E.: The principle of equality requires a comparative term to establish inequality; without such a term, the constitutional complaint lacks content and is inadmissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Principle of Equality Comparative Term Requirement Constitutional Complaint Radio License Concessions Inadmissible Procedural Defect

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 14 C.E.
Arts. 14, 16.1 y 20.1 C.E.
Art. 16.1 C.E.
Art. 20.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 395-1991

Fecha de resolución

16/09/1991

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 395/1991

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José María Maldonado Nausia contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo que desestima recurso de apelación contra la dictada por la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Nacional, sobre concesiones de emisoras de

radiodifusión en onda media. Arts. 14, 16.1 y 20.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1991/1991_00260-1991_00395.pdf