Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 400/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:400A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to rhetorical invocation without substantive legal argument.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 400/1990
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible for lack of procedural standing and substantive merit. The applicant, Dimas González Arranz, challenged a social court decision regarding pension benefits by invoking Articles 14 and 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found the arguments were merely rhetorical and lacked concrete legal content. Consequently, the court ruled that the invocation of effective judicial protection was insufficient to warrant further review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 24.1 C.E.: The invocation of effective judicial protection and equality before the law must be substantiated with concrete legal arguments; mere rhetorical references without specific legal grounds do not constitute a valid constitutional appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection rhetorical invocation equality before law substantive legal argument constitutional appeal inadmissibility procedural standing social court decision

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 14 C.E.
Art. 24.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1360-1990

Fecha de resolución

12/11/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.360/1990

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: invocación retórica. Principio de igualdad: igualdad en la aplicación de la Ley. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Dimas González Arranz contra Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco, que desestima el recurso de suplicación, contra la dictada por el Juzgado de lo Social núm. 1 de Vizcaya, sobre pensión de jubilación.

Arts. 14 y 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00400-1990_01360.pdf