Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of congruence between judgment and constitutional demand.
Spagna (ES)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to a lack of congruence between the contested judgment and the constitutional claim. The applicant requested free legal aid while challenging a sentence, but the court found the demand did not align with the specific constitutional protection sought. Consequently, the procedural requirement for a coherent constitutional complaint was not met.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 24 CE; Art. 44 CE: A constitutional appeal is inadmissible if the demand lacks congruence with the contested judgment, requiring the applicant to precisely identify the specific constitutional violation addressed by the decision.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 39-1990
Fecha de resolución
04/06/1990
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 39/1990
Resumen
Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Antonio Quiles Rey contra Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid. Art. 24. Solicita justicia gratuita.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00229-1990_00039.pdf