Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 425/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:425A Generato dall'IA

Spanish Constitutional Court dismisses appeal claiming violation of right to presumption of innocence due to insufficient evidentiary activity.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 425/1989
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by two individuals against a criminal conviction for robbery with violence. The applicants argued that the trial court failed to conduct sufficient probative activities, thereby violating their constitutional right to the presumption of innocence under Article 24.2 of the Constitution. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the lower courts had adequately fulfilled their duty to investigate and that the applicants' arguments lacked the necessary legal foundation to constitute a violation of their rights.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 113 C.P.; The right to the presumption of innocence does not automatically require exhaustive probative activity by the trial court, and a conviction remains valid if the lower courts have conducted a sufficient investigation to establish guilt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
presumption of innocence right to defense probative activity criminal conviction constitutional appeal evidentiary duty Article 24.2 CE

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.
Art. 113 C.P.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2137-1988

Fecha de resolución

21/07/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.137/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Rafael Bellido Gómez y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que confirma la de la Audiencia Provincial de Almería condenatoria por delito de robo con violencia e intimidación en las personas.

Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00425-1988_02137.pdf