Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
AUTO 402/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:402A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for appointment of defense counsel due to lack of procedural standing.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 402/1989
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by Alexandre Xavier Casanova Domingo regarding the appointment of a defense attorney. The petitioner sought representation to challenge a criminal conviction for fraud, but the Court found no merit in the request. Consequently, the Court declared the demand for amparo inadmissible due to the absence of a direct constitutional violation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to requests for the appointment of defense counsel when the underlying criminal conviction has already been confirmed on appeal and no direct constitutional infringement is alleged.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
right to defense criminal appeal constitutional amparo procedural standing fraud conviction

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 CE
Art. 24.1 CE

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2019-1988

Fecha de resolución

17/07/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando el archivo de las actuaciones en el procedimiento 2.019/1988

Resumen

Demanda de amparo: inexistencia.

Don Alexandre Xavier Casanova Domingo solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fín de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 25 que en apelación confirma la del Juzgado de Distrito

condenatoria por falta de estafa.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00402-1988_02019.pdf