Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 365/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:365A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of standing due to failure to appoint court-appointed counsel.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 365/1989
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to secure court-appointed legal representation before filing. The applicant, Emilio Sanchís Borlet, sought an attorney to challenge a Supreme Court judgment under Article 24 of the Constitution. The court ruled that without proper legal representation, the procedural requirements for the appeal were not met.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 119.1 LEC: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine an appeal filed without court-appointed counsel, as the right to effective judicial protection requires proper legal representation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
right to effective judicial protection court-appointed legal representation lack of standing procedural defects Article 24 Constitution

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.
Art. 119.1 LEC

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1754-1988

Fecha de resolución

03/07/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.754/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: no subsanación.

Don Emilio Sanchís Borlet solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fín de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Valencia recurrida en casación ante la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo.

Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00365-1988_01754.pdf