Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 277/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:277A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against theft conviction due to lack of procedural demand content. Karina Mohamed Amar's appeal for presumption of innocence is inadmissible. The court rejects the claim because the demand lacks necessary procedural content. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible due to the lack of procedural content in the demand. Karina Mohamed Amar's appeal regarding the presumption of innocence was rejected. The court found the demand procedurally defective and insufficient. The decision upholds the lower court's conviction on theft charges.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 277/1989
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible for lack of procedural content in the demand. Doña Karina Mohamed Amar challenged a theft conviction, arguing violations of the right to a fair trial and presumption of innocence under Article 24.2 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the demand failed to meet the specific procedural requirements necessary for admissibility.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 10.1 LEC: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the demand lacks the specific procedural content required by law, regardless of the substantive constitutional rights invoked.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedural content requirement inadmissibility of appeal presumption of innocence fair trial rights demand defectiveness Article 24.2 Constitution procedural prerequisites

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.2 C.E.
art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.
Art. 10.1 LEC

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 61-1989

Fecha de resolución

22/05/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 61/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Karina Mohamed Amar interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción de La Orotava, condenatoria por delito de hurto y de la Audiencia Provincial resolutoria de la apelación. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el

art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00277-1989_00061.pdf