Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 185/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:185A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal regarding presumption of innocence due to lack of specific constitutional demand content.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 185/1989
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Miguel Mirantes Manceñido against his conviction for destruction and fraud. Although the appellant invoked the right to the presumption of innocence under Article 24.2 of the Constitution, the court found the appeal lacked the necessary specific content required for admissibility. Consequently, the request was rejected because it failed to meet the procedural standards for challenging the trial's evidentiary activities.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The appeal must contain specific demands regarding the violation of constitutional rights; a generic invocation of the presumption of innocence without detailing the specific procedural defect or lack of evidence is insufficient for admissibility.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
presumption of innocence constitutional appeal admissibility specific content requirement evidentiary activities procedural defect

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.2 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1333-1988

Fecha de resolución

17/04/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.333/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria; prueba indiciaria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Miguel Mirantes Manceñido interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencias de la Audiencia Provincial de Palencia condenatoria por delitos de estragos y estafa y de la Sala Segunda de Tribunal Supremo resolutoria del recurso de casación. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00185-1988_01333.pdf