Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 39/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:39A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against denial of evidence receipt, ruling no fundamental right violation occurred.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 39/1989
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Angel María Velar Crespo against the denial of evidence receipt in a civil dispute. The applicant argued that the refusal violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, while the lower courts maintained the procedural decision was lawful. The Court concluded that the administrative denial did not constitute a violation of fundamental rights, thus rejecting the constitutional remedy.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The denial of evidence receipt by lower courts does not constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection when no fundamental rights are infringed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
right to effective judicial protection denial of evidence receipt constitutional appeal inadmissibility Article 24.1 Constitution procedural denial of evidence

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1727-1988

Fecha de resolución

23/01/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.727/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Prueba: su denegación no constituye violación de derecho fundamental. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Angel María Velar Crespo interponen recurso de amparo contra Autos de la Audiencia Provincial de Huesca, que deniegan recibimiento a prueba de apelación contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito de Huesca, sobre relación de obras. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00039-1988_01727.pdf