Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 34/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:34A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to missing edictal summons.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 34/1989
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the plaintiff failed to comply with the mandatory edictal summons required for effective judicial protection. The municipality argued the administrative court's resolution violated Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the procedural defect fatal. Consequently, the right to a court was deemed not effectively exercised due to the lack of proper notification.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 10.1 LEC: The right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution is not satisfied if the plaintiff fails to comply with the mandatory edictal summons required to notify the opposing party.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection edictal summons Article 24.1 Constitution procedural defect inadmissible appeal

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 10.1 LEC

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1276-1988

Fecha de resolución

23/01/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.276/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: emplazamiento edictal. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

El excelentísimo Ayuntamiento de Valencia interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Primera de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Valencia en recurso sobre resolución del Tribunal Económico de la Audiencia

Provincial de Valencia acerca del impuesto municipal sobre valor de los terrenos. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00034-1988_01276.pdf