Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 20/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:20A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to applicant's own lack of defense and defective complaint content.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 20/1989
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to appear in court proceedings initiated against him. The applicant argued that his rights under Article 24 of the Constitution were violated by the denial of his participation in investigations. The court ruled that the lack of defense was attributable to the applicant and the complaint lacked necessary constitutional content.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to situations where the applicant's own conduct prevents their participation or the complaint lacks constitutional substance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection lack of defense constitutional complaint content applicant's own fault inadmissibility of appeal

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1382-1988

Fecha de resolución

16/01/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.382/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: comparecencia del imputado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Luis Campo Mantilla interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones de la Sección Sexta de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona y del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 22, que deniegan la personación del recurrente en diligencias incoadas por denuncia

contra el mismo. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers