Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
AUTO 1249/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1249A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to prove the right to a court was violated.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 1249/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to substantiate the formal invocation of the right to a court. Although the applicant claimed a violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution regarding eviction proceedings, the court found no evidence of procedural defects. Consequently, the court ruled that the constitutional content of the claim was lacking due to this failure to prove the alleged violation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires the applicant to substantiate the formal invocation of the right to a court, and the appeal is inadmissible if this requirement is not met.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
right to a court formal invocation substantiation of claim inadmissible appeal procedural defect eviction proceedings Article 24.1 CE

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 151-1988

Fecha de resolución

21/11/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 151/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: no acreditada. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Julián Gonzalo Rodríguez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Primera de la Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza que en apelación confirma la del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 9, en juicio verbal de desahucio por precario. Invoca la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01249-1988_00151.pdf