Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 1144/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1144A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of comparison terms and ineffective judicial protection.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 1144/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Alvaro Espinosa Cabezas against disciplinary sanctions imposed on a judge. The appellant argued violations of equality, privacy, and effective judicial protection rights under Articles 14, 18, 24, and 25 of the Constitution. The court rejected these claims because the comparison terms for the equality argument were missing and the challenged sentence lacked the necessary constitutional content.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The principle of equality requires comparable terms for comparison, and effective judicial protection demands that the challenged decision possesses the requisite constitutional content to be subject to constitutional review.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Principle of Equality Effective Judicial Protection Constitutional Content Disciplinary Sanctions Judicial Independence

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 14 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 18, 24 y 25 C.E.
Art. 18 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 25 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1025-1988

Fecha de resolución

10/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.025/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Alvaro Espinosa Cabezas interpone recurso de amparo contra Resolución del Consejo General del Poder Judicial y Sentencia del Pleno del Tribunal Supremo derivada de recurso contencioso-administrativo en relación con Acuerdos sancionadores por faltas

disciplinarias. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 18, 24 y 25 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01144-1988_01025.pdf