Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 1105/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1105A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional appeal dismissed because the court's liability ruling was not a direct judicial violation of rights.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 1105/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mare Nostrum, S.A. against a district court ruling that denied a motion for nullity and established civil liability for a traffic accident. The appellant argued this violated their right to a fair trial under Article 24 of the Constitution, claiming the court's action constituted a direct violation. The court rejected this, holding that the district judge's decision to rule on liability was not an arbitrary judicial act but a legitimate exercise of judicial power, thus precluding constitutional review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 C.E.; The Constitutional Court's jurisdiction over appeals against judicial decisions is limited to cases where the violation stems from an arbitrary or illegal exercise of judicial power, excluding ordinary rulings on civil liability or procedural denials that do not constitute direct judicial arbitrariness.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
constitutional appeal inadmissibility judicial liability ruling direct judicial violation fair trial rights traffic accident civil liability arbitrary judicial power procedural nullity motion

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la resolución recurrida.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1277-1987

Fecha de resolución

10/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.277/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Imputabilidad directa de la violación a acción u omisión del órgano judicial: inexistencia. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente.

«Mare Nostrum, S. A.», interpone recurso de amparo contra providencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 2 de Fuengirola, que deniega solicitud de nulidad de actuaciones del juicio de faltas, derivado de accidente de circulación y que declara la

responsabilidad civil de la recurrente. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la resolución recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers