Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 866/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:866A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional appeal dismissed for lack of admissibility due to improper invocation of Article 24.1 CE.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 866/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Luis Arrillaga Aldama against lower court rulings dismissing a false accusation case. The applicant invoked Article 24.1 of the Constitution, arguing a violation of his right to judicial protection, but the court found the claim lacked constitutional content. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the formal invocation of the right was deemed untimely and the alleged violation did not meet constitutional standards.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal for lack of admissibility when the formal invocation of the right is untimely and the alleged violation lacks constitutional content.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Constitutional Appeal Article 24.1 CE Judicial Protection False Accusation Admissibility Requirements Procedural Impropriety Constitutional Content

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 523-1988

Fecha de resolución

04/07/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 523/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: no oportuna. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Luis Arrillaga Aldama interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 11 de Madrid, que acuerda archivo de diligencias previas incoadas por denuncia sobre falsedad, y de la Sección Cuarta de la Audiencia Provincial,

que desestima apelación. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers