Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to non-violated rights.
Spagna (ES)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Manuel Ruiz Lucas against a criminal conviction for lack of coercive measures. The petitioner argued that Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution were violated by the denial of effective judicial protection and requested a suspension of the sentence's execution. The court rejected these claims because the underlying rights were not actually violated and the demand lacked constitutional content.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArticles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution; The Constitutional Court holds that an appeal for protection is inadmissible when the rights invoked have not been violated and the demand lacks constitutional content.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1543-1987
Fecha de resolución
04/07/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.543/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Manuel Ruiz Lucas interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 3 de Sevilla que confirma la dictada por el de Distrito núm. 6, condenatoria por falta de coacciones. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en
los arts. 24.1 y 2 C.E. solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.
containers
Visualización
containers