Constitutional appeal dismissed due to unproven notification date and lack of constitutional content.
Spagna (ES)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Juan Herrera Segovia against a collective agreement published by the INAEM. The applicant alleged a violation of equality rights under Article 14 of the Constitution but failed to prove the notification date of the contested resolution. Consequently, the court rejected the appeal because the procedural defect precluded examination of the alleged constitutional infringement.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 44.1 CE; Art. 24 CE: A constitutional appeal is inadmissible if the notification date of the contested administrative act is not substantiated, as this prevents the court from verifying the existence of a constitutional violation within the statutory time limits.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 653-1988
Fecha de resolución
20/06/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 653/1988
Resumen
Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Juan Herrera Segovia interpone recurso de amparo contra Resolución de la Dirección General de Trabajo que publicó el primer Convenio Colectivo del INAEM. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 14 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00807-1988_00653.pdf