Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 461/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:461A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to procedural exhaustion failure.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 461/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Andrés Galera Huertas against administrative and supreme court rulings. The petitioner argued that his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution was violated regarding planning norm modifications. The court rejected this claim because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that all available judicial remedies had been properly exhausted before seeking constitutional relief.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine constitutional complaints if the applicant has not exhausted the ordinary judicial remedies provided by law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection exhaustion of remedies constitutional appeal inadmissibility administrative planning norms procedural prerequisites

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 184-1988

Fecha de resolución

18/04/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 184/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: inadmisión de recurso. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Andrés Galera Huertas interpone recurso de amparo contra Acuerdos del Ayuntamiento de Campo de Criptana, sobre modificación de normas subsidiarias de planeamiento, y contra Sentencias de las Salas de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de Albacete y de la

Sala Cuarta del Tribunal Supremo desestimatorias. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers