Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 267/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:267A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of legal interest due to absence of judicial review of the contested act.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 267/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Carlos José Urbano González against a provincial court conviction for coercion. The applicant argued that the lower court's decision violated his rights under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution by failing to review the legality of the underlying administrative act. The Court rejected this claim because the specific administrative act in question was already subject to judicial review, rendering the appeal for constitutional protection legally unfounded.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 2 C.E.: The right to judicial protection does not extend to cases where the contested administrative act is already subject to judicial review, as the requirement of legal interest is not met.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
judicial protection legal interest administrative act judicial review constitutional appeal effective remedy procedural admissibility

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1494-1987

Fecha de resolución

29/02/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.494/1987

Resumen

Inadmision. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Carlos José Urbano González interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial de Córdoba que en apelación revoca la del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 4 y condena por una falta de coacciones. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00267-1987_01494.pdf