Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 44/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:44A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of congruence between judgment and constitutional rights.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 44/1988
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to a lack of congruence between the lower court's judgment and the constitutional rights invoked. The applicant argued that the dismissal violated Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the contested decision did not infringe upon the right to effective judicial protection. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the challenged ruling was not the specific act causing the alleged constitutional violation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to review a judgment when the applicant fails to demonstrate that the contested decision itself violates the right to effective judicial protection, as the violation must stem from the specific act challenged.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
recurso de amparo inadmisión por incongruencia derecho a la tutela judicial congruencia de la sentencia vulneración del art. 24.1 C.E. Tribunal Constitucional despido laboral

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24.1 C.E.
derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1286-1987

Fecha de resolución

13/01/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.286/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Angel Martín Sánchez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 2 de La Coruña, confirmada en casación por la Sala Sexta del Tribunal Supremo, en autos de reclamación por despido. Invoca la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_00044-1987_01286.pdf