Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
AUTO 1248/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1248A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of effective judicial protection claim.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 1248/1987
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to demonstrate a violation of effective judicial protection. The applicant argued that the Supreme Court's suspension of administrative proceedings infringed his rights under Article 24 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that since the applicant did not exhaust available judicial remedies or prove the suspension violated his rights, the claim lacked constitutional content.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when a court suspends proceedings pending the resolution of a prior administrative claim, provided the suspension does not deprive the party of any substantive right.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
effective judicial protection suspension of proceedings administrative indemnification exhaustion of remedies constitutional appeal admissibility

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 886-1987

Fecha de resolución

10/11/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 886/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Vallés Canet interpone recurso de amparo contra Autos de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo que suspenden la tramitación del recurso contencioso-administrativo contra actos del Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Urbanismo sobre indemnización

de daños y perjuicios. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01248-1987_00886.pdf