Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
AUTO 1109/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1109A Generato dall'IA

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to failure to exhaust judicial remedies, as exhaustion was not attributable to the applicant.

Numero d'incarto AUTO 1109/1987
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Spagna (ES)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court declared the amparo inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust judicial remedies, a procedural requirement not attributable to her. The applicants challenged a labor court decision regarding the transfer of a hospital center, arguing violations of freedom of thought and belief under Article 16 of the Constitution. The court ruled that since the exhaustion of remedies was not the applicant's fault, the constitutional complaint could not proceed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 43.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an amparo inadmissible when the exhaustion of judicial remedies is not attributable to the applicant, even if the underlying claim concerns fundamental rights.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
exhaustion of remedies non-attributable failure labor dispute freedom of thought constitutional appeal procedural requirement inadmissible amparo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 43.1 C.E.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 542-1987

Fecha de resolución

13/10/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 524/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Agotamiento de recursos en la vía judicial: incumplimiento del requisito no imputable al recurrente. Libertad de ideas y creencias: relaciones laborales. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Elisa Isabel Farpon Canero y otras interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo que declara mal preparada la apelación contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso- Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial

de Valladolid que declaró procedente el traslado de las recurrentes acordado por la Dirección del centro hospitalario. Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagado en el art. 16 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01109-1987_00542.pdf