Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects under Estonian law.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court dismissed the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the defendant. The applicant argued that the judgment was final and binding, while the defendant contested jurisdiction and procedural irregularities. The court ruled that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and the proceedings violated Estonian public policy, leading to the rejection of enforcement.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment may not be enforced in Estonia if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction or if the proceedings violated fundamental principles of Estonian law.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
!"# $%
&
''!!
!
! (# %
! &$
)
##*
$
&!#$*!#
# !)
!
"
#$%&'%(($'#
! !
##&*
###&+!,#! $*
#,# #&
%*
# #$*!#
#
)
!
- #!
''!!
!
(# %
# &$
) ##*
$
&!$##$*!#
# !)!! ! !
!&$#$
*## #*!#. #*## #/ # !
0#
) # #
#)
001*
$
&! !#! $
..$!*+! # # *
$
&! $0 , *## #$
! #
*
*!#+# *!##
!2"# $%
&