Court dismissed execution objection against a final administrative decision regarding a public service contract. The court rejected the defendant's procedural arguments and upheld the original ruling. The court ruled that the administrative decision was valid and enforceable despite the defendant's objections. The court found no legal grounds to suspend the execution of the administrative act. The defendant failed to prove any error in the original decision-making process. The court emphasized the principle of legal certainty and finality of administrative rulings. The execution of the decision was confirmed as legally binding and enforceable. The court dismissed all claims raised by the defendant in the execution proceedings.

   
   
  
    

    
   
                 !       " # !    $ # %& !"
 "##$$  ""$" %
$   &"  '($  $)$   $ " &&$    $! !    !$*  $" & *    


  " 

"&  '  ! ++ * 
 " "&
"##$$  ""$"%
$   '($  $)$   $ "  &&$   ,  "      

$  !($  

" " &" -"!"" " "* ""$"   $ "  &&$ "'($  $)$  *   "& ""$" %
$ ""$  &"  !"&$   '($  $)$  $ " &&$  ,!($ "   " $ 

$  ""$"$  $$". "!"" 

** ""$" %
   "   $ " &&$  !($   "  ,  $*." ""$"%
$" "  ! " * &$ .  !($     " $ "  ""$"$  $$". "!""     $ " &&$  & "$(&" "*!"    

 , "$