Court denies early release on parole for a convicted individual due to lack of sufficient rehabilitation progress.
Estonia (EE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court ruled against the applicant, Mikhail Sammal, denying his request for conditional release before the sentence's expiration. The prosecution argued that Sammal had not demonstrated adequate rehabilitation or met the statutory requirements for early release. Consequently, the court determined that the conditions for granting conditional release were not satisfied.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IACriminal Procedure Code § 101; Criminal Procedure Code § 102: The court must evaluate whether the convicted person has sufficiently reformed and poses no danger to society before granting conditional release before the sentence expires.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
K O H T U M Ä Ä R U S Vangistusest tingimisi enne tähtaega vabastamine
Kohus Tartu Maakohus Määruse tegemise aeg ja koht
13. veebruar 2006 Viljandi kohtumaja Asja number 1-06-1322 Kohtunik Silvi Maiste Prokurör Merike Tikk Süüdimõistetu Mihhail Sammal
Resolutsioon Mitte vabastada süüdimõistetu Mihhail Sammal vangistusest tingimisi enne tähtaega.
Edasikaebamise kord Kohtumääruse peale võib esitada määruskaebuse Tartu Maakohtule Viljandi kohtumaja kaudu kümne päeva jooksul.
Silvi Maiste
Kohtunik