4-08-9866\5 Generato dall'IA

Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects in the original proceedings.

Numero d'incarto 4-08-9866\5

Autorità giudiziaria Tartu Maakohus Võru kohtumaja Põlvas

Giurisdizione

Estonia (EE)

Data della decisione 2008-11-07

Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court dismissed the enforcement application against a foreign judgment rendered in 2008. The applicant argued that the foreign court had proper jurisdiction, but the respondent contended that the proceedings were procedurally flawed and violated fundamental rights. The court ruled that the foreign judgment was not final and binding, and the domestic court lacked jurisdiction to enforce it under the relevant international treaties.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 24 of the Convention on the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced in Estonia if the judgment has not become final and binding in the country of origin or if the enforcing court lacks jurisdiction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

enforcement of foreign judgments lack of jurisdiction procedural defects finality of judgment international treaties fundamental rights enforcement proceedings

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Art. 24 of the Convention on the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

Testo completo

!"#

$%&%

!%%$%(%%)*++,+,-,.#*/

&%'%#%#)0!%%$%#

"%)

#&%%

, ')) $" !#%%23% ,,, 1 (&&4

-55 +,/!%%$%#"%)%0%6%5

%0%1(#%/2&

')) $" !#%%23% ,, 1 (&&4

-55,, /!%%$%#"%)%&), 5,%0

%1 (/2&

+ ) !%% $% #%# %# $" !#%%23% !"#

2#%%4%44)%0(/2&%)%#

%#4#+2&4#&&4"%

7#%# % )%# %%#%# $" !#%%23%# !%%

$%)%44%)%

'%)%4#1!%%$%##%%44

&&2%&%%#4!"#2#%%4%4#

&&2#"%%)&&!"#4#,2&4####

( /

$" !#%%23% % ,,, 1 (&&4

-55 +,/%%!%%$%#%%#)8+-#1,##%1

%6%5 %1

')"#1%#&%#%#

$"!#%%23%!"#2#%%4,, %%#1

,,--(&&4 -55,, /%%!%%$%#%%#)8

##%1+%6%5,%1

% "#1%# ) ,5 %5 , 5, %5

(, 5,*/%6%

!%% $% % # &% # &&) &4 )5

%) &%% &1 % # 2%)) %1 66)## % # 5 %###

%"2995##2&#&%%))%%1

66)##)#%%)#%1")%#)%1

%#%5#))2"4))4#)#)%#

8 ,, #1 , # % &% &%% #) ##

&& % )% %1 # %)% 8# 5 %

66)# % # % % &&) &4) "% ) %

%&1%4&1%5%&%%&1%#2%))466)##%

#5%###%"299

8 #"%1,+&)5%66)#%##&&)"%"%)

%5)%%154%6#%6%#

62&%%1%#&&62&

!%% $% % # ) &&) &45 %) &%%

&1%#2%))%1#%#5%###%"2995"

4 ## #)) %) )) %15 15 6# %

2&&&#6992&%

1 2 66)# & ) $" !#%%23% ,,, 1

&&4 -55 +, "%) % # (*,/ 2& % 4

$"!#%%23%,, 1&&4 -55,, "%)

%&)# (, 5,*: . *,/2&%

$%&%

Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects in the original proceedings.

Sintesi Legislator

Regesto Legislator

Parole chiave

Disposizioni normative citate

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Testo completo