Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects under Estonian law.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Tartu Regional Court dismissed the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the defendant. The plaintiff argued the judgment was final, but the court found the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and failed to notify the defendant properly. Consequently, the court ruled that the judgment could not be enforced in Estonia without a new trial.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment is unenforceable in Estonia if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction or if the defendant was not properly notified and given an opportunity to be heard.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
! "## $ %%#&&'(!) ! *) '$!&) )&*) '') +) $), )*-./.0) 1' * ' (!) ! * +) $), ) 2& #)3) / ), !'')4 & /0/0- )* )!4'',.&)&*)),
'') #) ) !$ )* #')! 4 0 !) '') '))0 '')$) )5 !46 !" 2& )#)3) )&& / ), !'')4 & /0/0-+) $), )*)7 , ) !, !80& (! *)) +) $), ) ))) # &)*!''))#&)))) ''*!') ) &88* &)) )!)''*'4&*0!')'),) )#)&**&&, ) )!0 ) ))&)#%%0&')&* )! *)*!*))&*)),
56 !" 7 ,-')$0)!)&*&)),) )&, #4) ! ! 88* &) & )&&) )&*) * ! &*0 ))$ '')0 )4'$'! *)!)&*)), * .& ))*')*)+) $),# !0 .&)2& )#)3)#&,& ))) ) ), )$')&) ) #))&*)'')) )$0 ) ' ! * +) $), ) ''* ! )&*) ), )$ 4' 9 7 , - ) *0 ) )* ! *), & )&**0 ) ! & ') ) )&&) )&*) * ' * "## $ &