Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BS-35122/2021-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2022:BS0000000676 Generato dall'IA

Family court appeal dismissed because the correct remedy was an appeal under the Act on Legal Aid.

Numero d'incarto BS-35122/2021-VLR
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Danimarca (DK)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Second Instance Court dismissed the father's appeal against a family court ruling that terminated joint parental authority and granted sole custody to the mother. The father attempted to challenge the decision, but the court found he incorrectly invoked the wrong legal remedy. The court ruled that the proper procedure for challenging such a decision was an appeal under the Act on Legal Aid, not the method used by the father.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Act on Legal Aid § 455, stk. 1; Act on Legal Aid § 368, stk. 1: A party challenging a family court decision on parental authority must file an appeal under the Act on Legal Aid; failure to use the correct statutory remedy results in dismissal of the challenge.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Act on Legal Aid parental authority legal remedy family court decision procedural error appeal procedure joint custody presupposto processuale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Act on Legal Aid § 455, stk. 1
Act on Legal Aid § 368, stk. 1
Generato dall'IA
BS-21/2012-OLR
Appeal court quashes lower court decision due to failure to record supplementary statements under Civil Procedure Act s. 214.3.
BS-390/2014-ODE
Father's request to change custody dismissed due to no significant change since prior court ruling.
BS-219/2014-VLR
Court temporarily suspends parental authority and remands case for factual review regarding child's best interests.
BS-29747/2025-OLR
Appeal against family court visitation order dismissed as no permit required under parental responsibility law.
BS-1566/2010-OLR
High Court upholds lower court's order for child expert examination before custody trial despite language issues.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Afvisning i kæremål i sag om forældremyndighed, bopæl og samvær, idet retsmidlet skulle have været anke jf. § 455, stk. 1, jf. § 368, stk. 1

[DOKUMENT] Dom (3 sider) VESTRE LANDSRET RETSBOG

Den 23. september 2021 holdt Vestre Landsret møde i retsbygningen i Viborg.

Landsdommerne Hanne Aagaard, John Lundum og Anne Toftdahl (kst.) behandlede sagen.

Sag BS-35122/2021-VLR (14. afdeling)

Far

mod

Mor (advokat Henriette Lyhne)

Ved dom af 3. september 2021 har Familieretten i Kolding (sag BS- 6342/2021-KOL) truffet afgørelse om, at den fælles forældremyndighed ophæves, og at Mor skal have forældremyndigheden alene over Barn 1 og Barn 2. Familieretten har endvidere truffet afgørelse om, at Barn 2 fortsat skal have bopæl hos Mor, og at Barn 1 skal have samvær med Far hver 4. lørdag i ulige uger.

Far har kæret dommen ved indlevering af kæreskrift den 17. septem-ber 2021.

Landsretten afsagde

KENDELSE

Familieretten i Kolding har ved dom af 3. september 2021 truffet afgørelse om forældremyndighed, bopæl og samvær. Far har indbragt dommen for landsretten ved indlevering af kæreskrift. Da rette retsmiddel er anke, jf. retsplejelovens § 455, stk. 1, jf. § 368, stk. 1, afviser landsretten kæremålet.

THI BESTEMMES:

Dette kæremål afvises.

Ingen af parterne skal betale sagsomkostninger for landsretten til den anden part.

Sagen sluttet.