Court dismissed costs claim due to lack of procedural standing and failure to meet burden of proof requirements.

The court dismissed the applicant's claim for legal costs, ruling that the applicant lacked the necessary procedural standing to challenge the decision. The applicant argued that the opposing party's conduct caused unnecessary expenses, but failed to provide sufficient evidence linking specific actions to the claimed costs. Consequently, the court determined that the claim was inadmissible because the applicant could not substantiate the causal relationship required for cost recovery.