Vestre Landsret upholds lower court ruling requiring prior judicial authorization for teleobservation despite owner consent.

The Vestre Landsret upheld the lower court's decision that prior judicial authorization is mandatory for teleobservation, even when the property owner consented to information disclosure. The owner argued that their consent should suffice for the surveillance measure, but the court rejected this position. The court ruled that statutory requirements for judicial oversight cannot be bypassed by private consent to ensure legal certainty and protect fundamental rights.