Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 BN 27/19, 4 BN 27/19 (4 CN 7/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:250919B4BN27.19.0 Generato dall'IA

Grant of revision for subsequent divergence from prior case law

Numero d'incarto 4 BN 27/19, 4 BN 27/19 (4 CN 7/19)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint for leave to appeal and ordered the admission of the revision proceedings, effectively prevailing for the appellant at this procedural stage. The dispute concerned a legal divergence, specifically where the judgment under challenge deviated from the Senate's own decision of June 6, 2019 (B 4 CN 7.18). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision in cases of subsequent divergence from a higher court's precedent, with the procedural cost and value assessment governed by §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Grant of revision for subsequent divergence from prior case law: The dispute concerned a legal divergence, specifically where the judgment under challenge deviated from the Senate's own decision of June 6, 2019 (B 4 CN 7.18). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision in cases of subsequent divergence from a higher court's precedent, with the procedural cost and value assessment governed by §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione di una decisione reclamo amministrativo previo valore litigioso decisioni incidentali motivazione del mutamento giurisprudenza ammissione provvisoria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Legal basis for admitting the revision due to subsequent divergence from the Senate's previous decision.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
4 B 67/09, 4 B 67/09 (4 C 7/10)
Admission of revision due to divergence from established case law on construction law interpretation
4 BN 41/18
Admissibility of revision complaint: divergence ground requiring precise contrast of substantive legal propositions rather than editorial summaries
4 B 21/22
Non-admission of revision for revision complaint: cross-referencing prior Senate decision to waive detailed justification under § 133 Abs. 5 VwGO
10 B 15/15
Admissibility of revision for divergence and claim amendments in declaratory actions against chamber officials regarding affiliated association statements
5 B 32/18 D
Non-Admissibility of Revision: Specificity Requirements for Fundamental Significance, Divergence, and Procedural Errors in Compensation Claims for Excessive Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Legal basis for admitting the revision due to subsequent divergence from the Senate's previous decision.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung wegen nachträglicher Divergenz

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO wegen nachträglicher Abweichung des angefochtenen Urteils von der Entscheidung des Senats vom 6. Juni 2019 - BVerwG 4 CN 7.18 - zuzulassen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.