Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9 B 43/18, 9 B 43/18 (9 C 6/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:120919B9B43.18.0 Generato dall'IA

Limitation period for public law claims for injunctive relief

Numero d'incarto 9 B 43/18, 9 B 43/18 (9 C 6/19)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (9th Senate) allowed an appeal on points of law to the higher court, ruling in favor of the plaintiffs' complaint for leave to appeal. The dispute concerned the limitation period for public law claims for injunctive relief (Unterlassungsansprüche). The court determined that the case possesses fundamental significance, as it requires the higher court to further develop the legal doctrine regarding the statute of limitations applicable to such claims under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, and ordered the provisional calculation of the amount in dispute for the subsequent appellate proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Limitation period for public law claims for injunctive relief: The dispute concerned the limitation period for public law claims for injunctive relief (Unterlassungsansprüche). The court determined that the case possesses fundamental significance, as it requires the higher court to further develop the legal doctrine regarding the statute of limitations applicable to such claims under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, and ordered the provisional calculation of the amount in dispute for the subsequent appellate proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
termini dottrina giuridica base di calcolo procedura di revisione azione inibitoria reclamo amministrativo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) in the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
2 C 20/19
Statutory limitation of compensation claims for EU-law-violating overtime in public service
2 B 15/21
Limitation of Public-Law Usage Fee Claims: Application of the Three-Year Civil Law Period and Rejection of the "Behaved Claim" Doctrine in Administrative Assessment
10 B 6/18
Statutory limitation suspension by a determination order in the context of public law recovery claims under § 53 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VwVfG
3 B 27/10
Reclamation of Lastenausgleich: Limitation period start upon statutory lifting of state administration and agency knowledge of damages compensation
2 B 18/21
Limitation of public-law usage fee claims: application of civil law statute of limitations to ancillary activity compensation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) in the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Verjährung öffentlich-rechtlicher Unterlassungsansprüche

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Kläger ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben, die Rechtsprechung zur Verjährung öffentlich-rechtlicher Unterlassungsansprüche fortzuentwickeln.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwertes für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.