Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 B 4/19, 4 B 4/19 (4 C 6/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:180919B4B4.19.0 Generato dall'IA

Appropriateness of private redevelopment services in urban planning agreements under § 11 Abs. 2 BauGB

Numero d'incarto 4 B 4/19, 4 B 4/19 (4 C 6/19)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the plaintiff's appeal to the revision court, allowing the case to proceed on the basis of § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, while tentatively fixing the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings under §§ 47 Abs. 1, 53 Abs. 3 GKG. The dispute concerns the appropriateness of contractual services in an urban planning agreement, specifically challenging the arrangement where a private individual acquired land from a third party and undertook the urban redevelopment on its own cost, while the municipality received compensation payments from the third party pursuant to § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB. The decisive legal issue for the upcoming revision is determining the prerequisites under which such agreed services are considered appropriate within the meaning of § 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB in light of the totality of circumstances, including the interplay between private investment and municipal compensation claims.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB, § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG; Appropriateness of private redevelopment services in urban planning agreements under § 11 Abs. 2 BauGB: 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, while tentatively fixing the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings under §§ 47 Abs. 1, 53 Abs. 3 GKG. The dispute concerns the appropriateness of contractual services in an urban planning agreement, specifically challenging the arrangement where a private individual acquired land from a third party and undertook the urban redevelopment on its own cost, while the municipality received compensation payments from the third party pursuant to § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB. The decisive legal issue for the upcoming revision is determining the prerequisites under which such agreed services are considered appropriate within the meaning of § 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB in light of the totality of circumstances, including the interplay between private investment and municipal compensation claims.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
urbanistica terreno comunale procedura di revisione investimento privato utilizzazione del fondo oneri della licenza edilizia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main legal basis for the admission of the revision appeal due to legal significance.
§ 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB
§ 154 Abs. 1 BauGB
2 Satz 1 BauGB sind, wenn ein Privater gegenüber der Gemeinde auf eigene Kosten die städtebauliche Sanierung der Grundstücke im Sanierungsgebiet übernimmt, die er zuvor von einem Dritten erworben hat, und die Gemeinde von dem Dritten Ausgleichsbeträge nach § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB erhält.
§ 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rules cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
4 BN 42/18
Sufficiency of informal urban planning measures for preemption statutes under § 25 BauGB: individual case assessment bars abstract legal clarification
4 BN 60/20
Municipal pre-emption ordinance validity: requirement of objective urban planning feasibility and genuine public interest under § 25 BauGB
4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)
Urban Planning Justification for Strengthening Central Service Areas: Requirements for Land-Use Plan Determinations
4 BN 35/18
Urban renewal statute invalidity: documentation requirements for balancing public and private interests under § 136 Abs. 4 Satz 3 BauGB
4 B 26/18
Appropriateness of outer-area residential expansion for home office under § 35 Abs. 4 S. 1 Nr. 5 b BauGB and objective assessment of living space needs

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main legal basis for the admission of the revision appeal due to legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rules cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Angemessenheit der Leistungen in einem städtebaulichen Vertrag

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde des Klägers wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, unter welchen Voraussetzungen die vereinbarten Leistungen in einem städtebaulichen Vertrag den gesamten Umständen nach angemessen im Sinne von § 11 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BauGB sind, wenn ein Privater gegenüber der Gemeinde auf eigene Kosten die städtebauliche Sanierung der Grundstücke im Sanierungsgebiet übernimmt, die er zuvor von einem Dritten erworben hat, und die Gemeinde von dem Dritten Ausgleichsbeträge nach § 154 Abs. 1 BauGB erhält.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 53 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.