Fictitious consent under § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB in immission control authorization proceedings
Germania (DE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the complainant's leave to appeal, ordering that the Revisionsverfahren proceed to clarify the legal issues, while a provisional amount in dispute was set. The dispute concerned the application of the fictitious consent mechanism under § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB within the context of an immission control authorization procedure. The court based its decision on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, finding that the matter contributes to the clarification of the prerequisites for fictitious consent in such proceedings, and calculated the value of the case in dispute according to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 1, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Fictitious consent under § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB in immission control authorization proceedings: The dispute concerned the application of the fictitious consent mechanism under § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB within the context of an immission control authorization procedure. The court based its decision on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, finding that the matter contributes to the clarification of the prerequisites for fictitious consent in such proceedings, and calculated the value of the case in dispute according to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 1, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAGrounds for the allowance of the appeal to the Federal Administrative Court.
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Testo completo
Revisionszulassung; Einvernehmensfiktion nach § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB im immissionsschutzrechtlichen Genehmigungsverfahren
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen der Einvernehmensfiktion nach § 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB im immissionsschutzrechtlichen Genehmigungsverfahren beitragen kann.
Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.