Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 71/18, 2 B 71/18 (2 C 11/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:260619B2B71.18.0 Generato dall'IA

Disciplinary dismissal for grant fraud: special aggravating factor for university professor misconduct

Numero d'incarto 2 B 71/18, 2 B 71/18 (2 C 11/19)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the admission of the defendant's appeal, granting it significance of general principle and vacating the lower court's decision for remand, as no substantive judgment on the merits was rendered in this interlocutory order. The dispute involves a disciplinary proceeding against a university professor regarding alleged research grant fraud, specifically challenging the assessment of disciplinary measures including dismissal from the civil service. The decisive legal basis centers on § 67 Sentence 1 of the North Rhine-Westphalia Civil Service Act (LDG NRW) in conjunction with § 132 No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO), focusing on whether specific service-related misconduct by a university professor constitutes a special aggravating factor (the "university professor minus") for the severity of disciplinary sanctions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW i.V.m. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Disciplinary dismissal for grant fraud: special aggravating factor for university professor misconduct: The dispute involves a disciplinary proceeding against a university professor regarding alleged research grant fraud, specifically challenging the assessment of disciplinary measures including dismissal from the civil service. The decisive legal basis centers on § 67 Sentence 1 of the North Rhine-Westphalia Civil Service Act (LDG NRW) in conjunction with § 132 No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO), focusing on whether specific service-related misconduct by a university professor constitutes a special aggravating factor (the "university professor minus") for the severity of disciplinary sanctions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca disciplinare ricerca universitaria truffa aggravata sanzione amministrativa truffa violazione procedurale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO hat.
§ 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW i.V.m. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the decision, cited to justify the admission of the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 19/14
Disciplinary dismissal for grant fraud; duty to notify aggravating factor based on academic status in sentencing discretion
2 B 9/16
Disciplinary dismissal of professor for grant fraud; evidentiary duty to investigate ministry's knowledge of fictitious applications
4 StR 150/10
Misuse of third-party research funding: mandatory return of unspent grants to university treasury and causal link for subsidy fraud
6 C 4/16
Revocation of doctoral degree for post-conferment bribery: statutory validity of university self-governance limits on academic integrity
2 B 19/16
Removal from public service for fraud against employer: threshold for final loss of trust and admissibility of review on merits

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW i.V.m. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the decision, cited to justify the admission of the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Disziplinare Ahndung eines Fördermittelbetrugs durch Hochschullehrer; Zulassung der Revision wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW i.V.m. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO hat.

Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur Klärung der Frage beizutragen, ob und ggf. unter welchen Voraussetzungen es einen besonderen Erschwerungsgrund für die Bemessung einer Disziplinarmaßnahme - hier: Entfernung aus dem Beamtenverhältnis - darstellt, dass es sich um ein dienstliches Fehlverhalten bei der Erfüllung der Dienstaufgaben eines Hochschullehrers handelt (Hochschullehrer-"Malus").